What’s in a word – Governance?
Governance boils down to the language in the governing documents of the diverse business. Certifying organizations will review these documents to make sure that there are no restrictions on the diverse owner’s ability to control the business. Each type of business structure has its own type of governing documents. These can include shareholder, voting, management, or partnership agreements, franchise or operating agreements; by-laws; or articles of incorporation.
How can a governing document restrict, or limit, a diverse owner’s ability to control the business?
My Women Business Enterprise (WBE) is a Corporation organized in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. In our original By-Laws, there is a clause that states “The President shall be the chief executive officer of the Corporation, and subject to the control of the Board, shall have management and supervision over and exercise general executive powers concerning all the property, business and affairs of the Corporation.” This clause actually addresses two issues.
- First, this document clearly identifies the company’s President as the Chief Executive Officer. So, in one sentence our By-Laws declare this as the highest position (President/CEO). If our By-Laws separated the position of President from that of CEO, then the CEO would hold the highest position. To maintain our WBE status, the CEO should be a woman.
- The second is “subject to the control of the Board”. Our Board is elected by the company’s shareholders. If the shareholders chose to elect three men and two women to the Board, my ability to govern my WBE business might be compromised by the heavily male populated Board. Fortunately that’s not the case since we happen to have three female and two male Board members, headed by a Chairwoman.
I recently reviewed a partnership agreement with a management clause that might raise questions: “Each of the Partners shall have an equal voice in the management and conduct of the partnership business. All decisions shall be by a majority vote and each partner shall be entitled to one vote. In the event of a tie vote, arbitration clause shall be invoked.” In this instance, everyone has an equal voice – no one partner controls this organization – and, it is less likely that this partnership could become certified, unless all partners meet the certifying agency’s diverse criteria. If I were part of this partnership, I might recommend we consider renegotiating the agreement to clearly establish a managing partner consistent with the diverse ownership.
A Limited Partnership Agreement establishes the rights and liabilities of both a general partner who actively manages the business and limited partners who do not. An LLP agreement that states “The General Partner shall have the sole and exclusive control of the limited partnership” clearly establishes who governs this business. An American Bar Association’s special edition for Managing Partners says: “Ideally, a managing partner’s job description is set forth in the firm’s partnership agreement, the constitution of the firm. Alternatively, there should be a partnership vote—reflected in the minutes of the firm—defining job responsibilities.” If a General Partner defined this way meets a certifying agency’s diverse criteria, it is likely this LLP can become certified.
If a franchise agreement says something like this: “ … distinguishing characteristics of the System include, without limitation, distinctive exterior and interior design, décor, color scheme, and furnishings; uniform standards, specifications, and procedures for operations; quality and uniformity of products and services offered; advertising and promotional programs; copyrighted information and materials; and adherence to the principles of Franchiser’s charter and missions mission statement …” then the franchiser appears to be in complete control and it is quite possible that a franchise of this type won’t receive certification.
DuPage County, Illinois says it best “Individuals who are not WBE/MBE may be involved in a WBE/MBE firm as owners, managers, employees, stockholders, officers and/or directors. Such individuals must not, however, possess or exercise the power to control the firm, or be disproportionately responsible for the operation of the firm.”
Review your governing documents before you apply for a diversity certification. And, if you think there is some question about your ability to run your business based on these documents, it might be time to consult your attorney.
[…] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Marian N., DiversityBizBlog. DiversityBizBlog said: New blog entry, What’s in a word – Governance?: http://www.getdiversitycertified.com/blog/2010/09/what-in-a-word-governance/ […]
-~, i can say that this kind of topic is really worth the read :”~
Interesting article. Were did you got all the information from… 🙂
This is Awesome…
I Really Enjoy Your Site…
[…] ← What’s in a word – Governance? Oops – Technical Issues → […]